- From: Erik Dahlström <ed@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:09:31 +0200
- To: robert@ocallahan.org, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 01:00:46 +0200, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > I've implemented some experimental features for applying SVG effects to > HTML. In particular, SVG 'filter', 'clip-path', and 'mask' properties are > made applicable to non-SVG content and SVG paint servers can be used as CSS > backgrounds. These are described with examples in my blog: > http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/roc/archives/2008/06/applying_svg_ef.html > http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/roc/archives/2008/07/svg_paint_serve.html > There are also links to experimental Firefox builds supporting these > features. > > I've written up a draft specification for these features: > http://people.mozilla.com/~roc/SVG-CSS-Effects-Draft.html On extending the filter, mask and clip-path properties: - The interaction (and rendering order) between css 'clip'[1] and svg clip-path and mask needs to be defined > I'd greatly appreciate any comments. One thing I'm not sure about is where > this specification should live. I'd be happy to include the 'filter' property stuff into the SVG 1.2 filter module[2], but I'm not sure if that'd be more of a recommendation for how the host language (html/css) should define it. > Obviously it's right in between two working > groups :-). Well, between two or three working groups even, depending on how you want to see it. > Another thing I'm interested in resolving is how we should > expose these in Gecko releases; using a vendor prefix would be more annoying > than usual because I've created no new properties here (in fact, no new > syntax at all). Yes, this is awkward. Is there any way in css to test for support of a particular property on a particular element? I guess something similar to the svg <switch> element would have been quite handy. > One thing that's obviously missing here is transformations. I don't think > there's any value in linking to SVG for those. Unless you want to animate the transform I suppose. > Instead I support CSS-based > transformations like Apple's proposal (at least its 2D subset). (In fact > someone is actually working on implementing that for Gecko.) Applying transforms from css on svg content would be interesting, I agree. Cheers /Erik [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visufx.html#clipping [2] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/Filters -- Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Friday, 11 July 2008 14:10:09 UTC