- From: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 23:26:52 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
Section 3.1.1 on gamma correction Is this really needed? No web browser on Mac OS is doing this, and I'm not aware of any browser on SGI doing it either. This section is so old it even references CRTs, which aren't even manufactured anymore. In the epoch that this section was originally written in, what was true about the stability of CRT primaries is not at all true about LCD primaries. What was considered to be the bigger problem: tone reproduction, is no longer the only major problem. I think it's a rather large gaffe for the W3C to keep this section in, while simultaneously yanking previous plans for ICC implementation. While I'm not a fan of the details of that implementation (the non- default behavior for color profile which ignores embedded profiles is a 3rd order heretical event; and the default for honoring the ICC profile intent flag), that is absolutely the more appropriate direction to go in than the obsolete section 3.1.1 as proposed. I suggest the W3C remove the antiquated, irrelevant and in practice entirely ignored section 3.1.1, and replace it with an expected and assumed source color space for all untagged content, of sRGB IEC61966-2.1. This would apply to CSS content, untagged JPEG, GIF and PNG. As for options for overriding, I find that interesting but not as big of a problem as Section 3.1.1 which by the way can easily be read to mean that any embedded profile in an image must be ignored in favor of the encoding stipulated in this section. Not OK. Chris Murphy Color Remedies (TM) New York, NY ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Co-author "Real World Color Management, 2nd Ed"
Received on Thursday, 10 July 2008 05:15:12 UTC