- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:42:43 -0700
- To: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Anton Prowse wrote: > > Ingo Chao's concerns are valid, as are those of expressed > (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Oct/0017.html) by > Roger Olsson in 2006. In response to the latter, Mike Bremford stated > (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Oct/0018.html) that > 9.9.1 is "confusing, poorly worded, and correct." Alas only the first > two adjectives hold. > ... > Due to the number of problems involved, I have taken the unusual step of > presenting and analysing them in a separate paper rather than treating > them here on this mailing list: > http://dev.moonhenge.net/css21/spec/z-index/ . The paper presents > several proposals for the clarification of the relevant sections of the > specification. ... Recorded as CSS2.1 Issue 60: http://csswg.inkedblade.net/spec/css2.1#issue-60 ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 3 July 2008 20:43:24 UTC