- From: Dmitry Turin <sql4-en@narod.ru>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:38:58 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
David, DD> A new tag doesn't require any user agents to rewrite their entire DD> parse engine to mix in data from multiple souce. Since engine support JS, it is 'trigger' engine, isn't it ? Where are you get 'entire' ? >>>> 1) CAS will reduce manual job >>>> ("multiply to quantity of population, than to quantity of >>>> pages on sites - and you will get real number of duplications, >>>> which are quite not little") DD> The reduction you say will be achieved will be so small as to not be DD> worthwhile. Many properties are used extremely seldom; and many properties, proposed to standardizations, will be used extremely seldom, but manufactorer of browsers spend efforts to implement them. --- >>>> User gets benefit (unnecessary to keep separation in brain), >> DD> As mentioned, this is a disadvantage. >> Excuse me, explain, how "unnecessary to keep separation in brain" >> is "disadvantage". DD> I've already explained how separating presentation from content is an DD> advantage. Your proposal removes that. Proposal withdraw possibilities neither in HTML, nor in CSS. It only present new. DD> CSS contains presentation. You can discard the presentation without DD> losing any meaning. Your proposal moves ... Not 'moves', but 'allows to move'. Nothing disturb author to write in previous manner. DD> ... meaning into an external DD> file. It cannot be discarded without losing meaning. Author can harm itself more simply: by deleting instead of moving. And author can make this even now. Dmitry Turin SQL5 (5.9.1) http://sql50.euro.ru HTML6 (6.5.1) http://html60.euro.ru Unicode7 (7.2.1) http://unicode70.euro.ru Computer2 (2.0.2) http://computer20.euro.ru
Received on Friday, 18 January 2008 10:39:14 UTC