- From: Dmitry Turin <sql4-en@narod.ru>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:38:58 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
David,
DD> A new tag doesn't require any user agents to rewrite their entire
DD> parse engine to mix in data from multiple souce.
Since engine support JS, it is 'trigger' engine, isn't it ?
Where are you get 'entire' ?
>>>> 1) CAS will reduce manual job
>>>> ("multiply to quantity of population, than to quantity of
>>>> pages on sites - and you will get real number of duplications,
>>>> which are quite not little")
DD> The reduction you say will be achieved will be so small as to not be
DD> worthwhile.
Many properties are used extremely seldom;
and many properties, proposed to standardizations,
will be used extremely seldom,
but manufactorer of browsers spend efforts to implement them.
---
>>>> User gets benefit (unnecessary to keep separation in brain),
>> DD> As mentioned, this is a disadvantage.
>> Excuse me, explain, how "unnecessary to keep separation in brain"
>> is "disadvantage".
DD> I've already explained how separating presentation from content is an
DD> advantage. Your proposal removes that.
Proposal withdraw possibilities neither in HTML, nor in CSS.
It only present new.
DD> CSS contains presentation. You can discard the presentation without
DD> losing any meaning. Your proposal moves ...
Not 'moves', but 'allows to move'.
Nothing disturb author to write in previous manner.
DD> ... meaning into an external
DD> file. It cannot be discarded without losing meaning.
Author can harm itself more simply: by deleting instead of moving.
And author can make this even now.
Dmitry Turin
SQL5 (5.9.1) http://sql50.euro.ru
HTML6 (6.5.1) http://html60.euro.ru
Unicode7 (7.2.1) http://unicode70.euro.ru
Computer2 (2.0.2) http://computer20.euro.ru
Received on Friday, 18 January 2008 10:39:14 UTC