- From: Patrick Garies <pgaries@fastmail.us>
- Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 04:24:08 -0600
- To: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
> If it shows scrollbars then for the paragraph
>
> <p style="width: 100px; height:100px; background: lightgreen;">some
> content that does not fit into a container without getting big enough
> to trigger scroll bars</p>
>
> 1) outer box [1] does not match margin box of the element.
> 2) or some box other than border/margin box is used for computation
of content
> dimensions of scrollable element. Which one?
With regard to 1), define “outer box”. It seems to me that you might be
confusing which element that overflow: auto was applied to; it wasn’t
the paragraph element.
With regard to 2), the content dimensions of the scrollable element (the
div element) are calculated with respect to the amount of content inside
that element (including any overflowing content within). That seems
pretty obvious to me, anyway.
Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
> Compare this sample:
> http://www.terrainformatica.com/w3/overflow-visible.htm in IE and in
> FF for example.
It helps if you specify version numbers. For example, the renderings of
Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 and Windows Internet Explorer 7 can be
quite different; this is notably the case with this specific document.
Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
> Two paragraphs on top have text overlapped in FF. That is because
> Gecko uses overflow:visible; literally and it appears as Trident
> interprets overflow:visible; as overflow:never for all elements (as
> for cells). At least I cannot manage to convince IE(6) to overflow in
> such cases.
Again, it helps if you specify version numbers, this time for rendering
engines (or if you would stick to mentioning browsers (with version
numbers) instead of rendering engines).
The MSIE6 behavior that you see is a well known bug (or perhaps it was
intentional?). This isn’t the behavior of WIE7.
(I also think that property value keywords like “resize”,
“resize-element”, “expand”, or “expand-element” are more easily
understood than “never”.)
Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
> I personally think that IE (Trident) behavior is more humanistic in
> this case - leads to more stable and readable renderings.
While is does, perhaps, lead to more readable renderings, the MSIE6
behavior breaks certain CSS‐based layouts. You might want to check out
the article IE/win Expanding Box located at the URI
<http://www.positioniseverything.net/explorer/expandingboxbug.html>. One
could maintain readability, instead, via the overflow: auto declaration.
Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
> For IE scrollbar in case #3 (above) is logical (you see no yellow
> background there). But it is a mystery for me why Gecko show
> scrollbars and yellow space - space that was not allocated to any
> element. For the record: Opera (9.x) shows only v-scrollbar there.
Just think of an element with scrollbars like a viewport within a
viewport. For example, when an author uses the rule html, body { height:
100%; } (a common technique) and content overflows into space not
allocated to any element (i.e., beyond the bottom of the html and body
elements and the viewport), I don’t see anything odd about it. New space
within the container of the element that is overflowing (e.g., the
viewport in my example and the div element in “case #3”) is simply being
generated to handle the overflowing content since that content has to go
somewhere.
I find the MSIE6 rendering to be illogical since the background color is
not respecting the 100 by 100 pixel dimensions of the paragraph element.
If it were, then you’d be seeing the yellow background of the containing
div element for any content that escapes the bounds of that 100 by 100
pixel box. Instead, the browser is not honoring the width and height of
the paragraph element.
The WIE7 behavior makes no sense, initially; this is probably due to a
bug. I see a green box with no scrollbars and overflowing content cut
off. However, if I start highlighting the text and drag my mouse cursor
downward and beyond the bottom edge of the box, suddenly, two scrollbars
materialize and I get the behavior of Mozilla Firefox 2.
As for Opera, I see that too in version 9.25. IMO, that rendering is
incorrect since the scrolling mechanism needed to access the text
overflowing to the right is missing (i.e., the horizontal scrollbar
should be present).
Mozilla Firefox 2 and Safari 3 (Windows beta) do things as expected by
providing two scrollbars and showing the yellow background of the
containing div element when the text overflows the bounds of the 100×100
pixel paragraph.
— Patrick Garies
Received on Wednesday, 9 January 2008 10:24:21 UTC