- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 14:27:07 +0000
- To: www-style CSS <www-style@w3.org>
John Oyler wrote: > > If the float center is used in this manner, then it truly could > semantically be a headline, and have the text reflow around it such that In early 20th century newspapers, this sort of thing might well have been a secondary headline, in the cluster of headlines at the top of the article. > it looks as if it were in the middle. Or am I visualizing this wrong? As I noted before, I've failed to find any example where it splits but doesn't span a column, but a concrete example of the sort of thing that is actually done, or as much of it as I think is safe under fair usage, would be an editorial on page 18 of the [London] Evening Standard for 2007-12-17. The main headline actually spans two columns on one page and the whole of the next, although I'm only describing the first two columns here. The main headline is "Gateway to a housing disaster". Halfway down the first two columns, centred between them and taking up half of each column is a quote: "The Government has oversold what it can do. It is treating it like a new town where it owns the land" This quote actually comes from a quarter way down the second column, so is not close in position to the pull-out. From a styling point of view, it is probably important that the quote appears approximately in the centre, both vertically and horizontally, and that it is between columns (although it encroaches on them and their width is reduced for its duration). The font size of the quote is about twice that of the body text and there is a rule at the end of it. In this case, it starts on the last line of a paragraph in the column to its left and mid-paragraph, in the one to its right. There is also what seems to be a secondary headline (not a subheading), as I cannot find it by skimming the text, which takes up the first 2.5 column inches of the second column. Logically this belongs in the headlines, even though it has been physically set half way through the text. This isn't as clear cut, as, though it visually clear that it is part of the second column, one could argue that it is really part of the heading and the two columns are of unequal length. There are byelines, etc., at the top of the first column. To maintain separation of style and fluidity, I think one would need to include both the secondary headline and the quote after the main headline and have a styling function that says: Centre this vertically and horizontally within the columns on the current page. Ignore it if there is not a reasonable amount of room. If there are an odd number of columns, do not flow round and use a whole column. If there are an even number of columns, make it the width of one column and place it centred on the dividing line. Flow the text to left and right. (As an alternative to the odd number of columns case, the designer might want to be able to say: move right or move left, to align between columns, if there is more than one column. They may well want more options than centre, e.g. between the first two, last two, etc. They may want to be able to specify that it can be processed on the next page, if there isn't room on the current one.) The Evening Standard is published by Associated Press, who presumably own the copyright for that article. The article was selected because I had that copy and it showed an example of the construct. Please use mono-spaced font for the following. Key: M - Main headline S - Secondary Headline B - Byeline T - Body Text Q - Pullout Quote +--- Edge of page V MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM BBBBBBBBBBBBBBB SSSSSSSSSSSSSS BBBBBBBBBBBBBBB SSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSS TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT SSSSSSSSSSSSSS TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT SSSSSSSSSSSSSS TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT SSSSSSSSSSSSSS TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT SSSSSSSSSSSSSS TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT SSSSSSSSSSSSSS TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT SSSSSSSSSSSSSS TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT \ TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT } Quote taken from here. TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT / TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTT TTTTTT TTTTTTT "QQQQQQQQQQQQQ TTTTTT TTTTTTT QQQQQQQQQQQQQQ TTTTTT TTTTTTT QQQQQQQQQQQQQQ TTTTTT TTTTTTT QQQQQQQQQQQQQQ TTTTTT TTTTTTT QQQQQQQQQQQQQQ TTTTTT TTTTTTT QQQQQQQQQQQQQQ TTTTTT TTTTTTT QQQQQQQQQQQQQ" TTTTTT TTTTTTT ============== TTTTTT TTTTTTT TTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Saturday, 5 January 2008 14:27:44 UTC