- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 14:27:07 +0000
- To: www-style CSS <www-style@w3.org>
John Oyler wrote:
>
> If the float center is used in this manner, then it truly could
> semantically be a headline, and have the text reflow around it such that
In early 20th century newspapers, this sort of thing might well have
been a secondary headline, in the cluster of headlines at the top of the
article.
> it looks as if it were in the middle. Or am I visualizing this wrong?
As I noted before, I've failed to find any example where it splits but
doesn't span a column, but a concrete example of the sort of thing that
is actually done, or as much of it as I think is safe under fair usage,
would be an editorial on page 18 of the [London] Evening Standard for
2007-12-17.
The main headline actually spans two columns on one page and the whole
of the next, although I'm only describing the first two columns here.
The main headline is "Gateway to a housing disaster".
Halfway down the first two columns, centred between them and taking up
half of each column is a quote: "The Government has oversold what it
can do. It is treating it like a new town where it owns the land" This
quote actually comes from a quarter way down the second column, so is
not close in position to the pull-out. From a styling point of view, it
is probably important that the quote appears approximately in the
centre, both vertically and horizontally, and that it is between columns
(although it encroaches on them and their width is reduced for its
duration). The font size of the quote is about twice that of the body
text and there is a rule at the end of it.
In this case, it starts on the last line of a paragraph in the column to
its left and mid-paragraph, in the one to its right.
There is also what seems to be a secondary headline (not a subheading),
as I cannot find it by skimming the text, which takes up the first 2.5
column inches of the second column. Logically this belongs in the
headlines, even though it has been physically set half way through the
text. This isn't as clear cut, as, though it visually clear that it is
part of the second column, one could argue that it is really part of the
heading and the two columns are of unequal length.
There are byelines, etc., at the top of the first column.
To maintain separation of style and fluidity, I think one would need to
include both the secondary headline and the quote after the main
headline and have a styling function that says:
Centre this vertically and horizontally within the columns on the
current page.
Ignore it if there is not a reasonable amount of room.
If there are an odd number of columns, do not flow round and use a whole
column.
If there are an even number of columns, make it the width of one column
and place it centred on the dividing line. Flow the text to left and right.
(As an alternative to the odd number of columns case, the designer might
want to be able to say: move right or move left, to align between
columns, if there is more than one column. They may well want more
options than centre, e.g. between the first two, last two, etc. They
may want to be able to specify that it can be processed on the next
page, if there isn't room on the current one.)
The Evening Standard is published by Associated Press, who presumably
own the copyright for that article. The article was selected because I
had that copy and it showed an example of the construct.
Please use mono-spaced font for the following.
Key: M - Main headline
S - Secondary Headline
B - Byeline
T - Body Text
Q - Pullout Quote
+--- Edge of page
V
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBB SSSSSSSSSSSSSS
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBB SSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SSSSSSSSSSSSSS
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT SSSSSSSSSSSSSS
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT SSSSSSSSSSSSSS
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT SSSSSSSSSSSSSS
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT SSSSSSSSSSSSSS
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT SSSSSSSSSSSSSS
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT SSSSSSSSSSSSSS
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT \
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT } Quote taken from here.
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT /
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTT TTTTTT
TTTTTTT "QQQQQQQQQQQQQ TTTTTT
TTTTTTT QQQQQQQQQQQQQQ TTTTTT
TTTTTTT QQQQQQQQQQQQQQ TTTTTT
TTTTTTT QQQQQQQQQQQQQQ TTTTTT
TTTTTTT QQQQQQQQQQQQQQ TTTTTT
TTTTTTT QQQQQQQQQQQQQQ TTTTTT
TTTTTTT QQQQQQQQQQQQQ" TTTTTT
TTTTTTT ============== TTTTTT
TTTTTTT TTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Saturday, 5 January 2008 14:27:44 UTC