- From: Brad Kemper <brkemper@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 21:36:32 -0800
- To: Philip TAYLOR <Philip-and-LeKhanh@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org>
- Cc: James Elmore <James.Elmore@cox.net>, CSS <www-style@w3.org>
On Jan 3, 2008, at 9:43 AM, Philip TAYLOR wrote: > James Elmore wrote: > >> Philip -- I recognize what you are saying; but I won't let the >> design preferences of a small minority of users stop me from >> expressing my own design preferences on my own web pages. > > And nor will I; all I am trying to achieve is > agreement that CSS cannot (and is not intended to) > allow /control/ of a web page's appearance; all > it can do is to /influence/ that appearance. > > Philip TAYLOR You're splitting hairs. I suspect you are splitting hairs just for the sake of starting and fueling an argument. Control is not an something which is either absolute or non-existent, with nothing in between. There is a whole range of levels of control, and no one advocating for the ability of the author to control the presentation of the pages they present to the world is suggesting that the control they aim for is absolute. If you set your user style sheets to override those of the original author, then you are becoming, in a sense, co-author of the page because you also want some of the control. If you think you know better than me how the page I created should be styled, then go for it, and live with the results. I spend hours tweaking the CSS, not for my own ego gratification, but because I am a professional who thinks he can do a good job styling it for those who would consume it. I can do a better job at that task when I have a reasonable expectation of what it will look like when rendered, and how it will act, including when the window is resized or the text magnification changed, or when it is presented on various different devices of different capabilities, screen sizes, etc.
Received on Friday, 4 January 2008 15:14:47 UTC