- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 22:14:29 +0000
- To: CSS <www-style@w3.org>
James Elmore wrote: > > Not exactly unpredictable. Some people (a very small percentage that I > am aware of) have !important styles which override the browser and the Noting that most accessibility options in IE effectively introduce !important rules, the reasons that people don't use such rules very often are much more to do with: - ignorance (exacerbated by browsers being designed for commercial author wants, not consumer needs); - the bad design of important sites that means they can become unusable, if you try to override style sheets (and often if you turn them off entirely). Although this is only anecdotal, my experience of talking to people is that quite a significant proportion of web users find web pages difficult to use for reasons that could be avoided by a combination of proper use of HTML and selective or complete disabling of CSS. Since designers started using 7 x 5 fonts, I have font sizes more or less permanently disabled, except when accessing sites that are too broken (overlaps, normally) with the browser default font sizes. In the past I have had to disable colours as well, because a designer has thought it cool to use very low colour contrasts (bt.com was once a problem site in this respect). -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Thursday, 3 January 2008 22:14:58 UTC