- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:55:50 -0800
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Isn't "projection" considered a paged media? Maybe it would be better to say that: # The ‘height’ media feature describes the height of the targeted # display area of the viewport. For paged media, the terms # "viewports" and "page box" are equivalent. On Dec 24, 2008, at 9:14 AM, L. David Baron wrote: > > We revised the wording for 'height', 'width', 'device-height', and > 'device-width' to make it clearer how they behave in paged media. > For example, the definition of 'height' is: > # The ‘height’ media feature describes the height of the targeted > # display area of the output device. For continuous media, this is > # the height of the viewport. For paged media, this is the height > # of the page box. > > I think we should make similar clarifications to 'aspect-ratio', > 'device-aspect-ratio', and 'orientation'. In particular, I think > 'aspect-ratio' and 'orientation' should be like 'height' and > 'width', while 'device-aspect-ratio' should be like 'device-height' > and 'device-width'. > > It might even be good to define 'aspect-ratio' and 'orientation' in > terms of 'width' and 'height', and define 'device-aspect-ratio' in > terms of 'device-width' and 'device-height'. > > -David > > -- > L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ > Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/ >
Received on Wednesday, 24 December 2008 18:56:26 UTC