- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:27:28 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Saturday 2008-12-20 22:06 -0600, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > (Really, though, this just makes me wonder why list-style-image exists > at all, when it's truly just a special value for list-style-type - > type and image are mutually exclusive, after all. It would be > unambiguous to have type accept a url, and this parsing issue wouldn't > arise at all.) Having the type allows fallback when the image doesn't load or isn't a supported type. That said, perhaps that suggests the syntax ought to be like 'cursor', with an arbitrary number of url() values (often zero) followed by a mandatory single type. -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Sunday, 21 December 2008 04:28:04 UTC