- From: Simon Montagu <smontagu@smontagu.org>
- Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 01:17:25 -0800
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Daniel Glazman wrote: > > Change proposals to section 14.2.1 of CSS 2.1: > > new text: > > start > Equivalent to 'left' when the direction is left-ro-right, and > 'right' when the direction is right-to-left. Typo fix: "left-to-right" > end > Equivalent to 'right' when the direction is right-to-left, and > 'left' when the direction is right-to-left. The first "right-to-left" should be "left-to-right". > > and change: > > <length> > A length L aligns the top left corner of the image a distance L to > the right of (for horizontal) or below (for vertical) the top left > corner of the element's padding box. For example [snip] > > to > > <length> > If the text direction is ltr (resp. rtl), a length L aligns the > top left (resp. top right) corner of the image a distance L to > the right (resp. left) of (for horizontal) or below (for vertical) > the top left (resp. the top right) corner of the element's padding > box. For example [snip]. > > and I very seriously wonder if same change should not be done to > <percentage> values, %age should probably apply from top right corner > instead of top left in rtl. > > </Daniel> >
Received on Sunday, 14 December 2008 09:18:09 UTC