- From: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 12:22:38 -0800
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
That is one way to look at it. Another is to say "text within <nowrap> loses its wrapping capabilities". That would greatly simplify boundary issues. It would make <nowrap>_space_</nowrap> behave as non-breaking space which may sometimes be surprising but logical and consistent. -----Original Message----- From: fantasai [mailto:fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 12:01 PM To: Bjoern Hoehrmann Cc: Alex Mogilevsky; www-style@w3.org Subject: Re: FW: NoWrap property Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > > So the only remaining question is whether > > xy := <nowrap>x</nowrap><nowrap>y</nowrap> > > should wrap the same as > > <nowrap>xy</nowrap> I strongly disagree with this. If there is normally a break opportunity between x and y (e.g. if x and y are kanji) then there should be a break opportunity between <nowrap>x</nowrap> and <nowrap>y</nowrap>. ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 8 December 2008 20:23:21 UTC