- From: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:29:50 +0100
- To: "Grant, Melinda" <melinda.grant@hp.com>
- Cc: Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
I see that they've been made image properties image-fit and image-position. Even though it isn't a great stretch to call video an image (a moving one), wouldn't these properties apply to all replaced content with an intrinsic size? If so, wouldn't content-orientation, content-fit and content-position be more fitting names? Philip On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 18:57 +0000, Grant, Melinda wrote: > Dean said: > > Aside: I'm not sure why these are in Paged Media. They seem > > applicable to continuous media too. > > Yes, as indicated by their 'Applies to' field. > > They're there because (1) the print implementations were the first to implement these; and (2) because we wanted them in a module that could progress rapidly to REC once CSS 2.1 is done. They certainly could be moved if there is a better place to put them... > > These properties have been changed significantly (but not in ways that diminish their applicability here) so there will be another Last Call on this-- see http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-page/#img-fit for the latest. > > Best wishes, > > Melinda -- Philip Jägenstedt Opera Software
Received on Wednesday, 3 December 2008 19:30:38 UTC