- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:10:27 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
L. David Baron wrote: > CSS 2.1 added the following text: > # The computed value of "font-weight" is either: > # > # * one of the legal number values, or > # * one of the legal number values combined with one or more of > # the relative values (bolder or lighter). This type of > # computed values is necessary to use when the font in > # question does not have all weight variations that are > # needed. > http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/CR-CSS21-20070719/fonts.html#font-boldness > > This text doesn't say what specified values lead to these computed > values. It is, in fact, ambiguous, and could lead to two different > sets of results, as explained below. The CSSWG decided not to define this in CSS2.1, and I was given an action item to write a note that basically says that. Here's a proposed note: Note: A set of nested elements that mix 'bolder' and 'lighter' will give unpredictable results depending on the UA, OS, and font availability. This behavior will more precisely defined in CSS3. ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 21 August 2008 23:11:00 UTC