- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:47:02 +0100
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, www-style@w3.org
L. David Baron wrote: > > I think what we want to do is replace: > # The bottom margin of an in-flow block-level element with a > # 'height' of 'auto' and 'min-height' less than the element's used > # height and 'max-height' greater than the element's used height > # is adjoining to its last in-flow block-level child's bottom > # margin if the element has no bottom padding or border. > > with: > # The bottom margin of an in-flow block-level element is adjoining > # to its last in-flow block-level child's bottom margin when: > # * the element's specified 'height' is 'auto', > # * the element's computed height is the same as it would have > # been if the specified value of 'min-height' were '0' and the > # specified value of 'max-height' were 'none', and > # * the element has no bottom padding or border. > > This fixes the issue in this thread using the hypothetical, and also > fixes the issue (pointed out recently, I think) that the text should > say something about blocks where the height conditions do not match. Couldn't that second bullet just say * the element's used height is the same as it would have been if 'min-height' and 'max-height' had their initial values ? ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 21 August 2008 22:47:39 UTC