- From: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:46:41 +1000
- To: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
François REMY wrote: > Hello, > I see two use-cases for a "position-stack" property. > One of the two can be work-aroundable but the second one need total > change of the structure of the page. > > ================ > > UC 1 : > > This property will allow designer to do such type of things : > > <html><body><div> > Some content : > <div style="inline:block; height: 1.12em; width: 100px; > position-stack: create-new;"> > <img class="top left corner" /> > <img class="top right corner" /> > <img class="bottom left corner" /> > <img class="bottom right corner" /> > </div>. It worked great ! > </div></body></html> If you can not do a test case, can you at least show this concept via a graphic. I have know idea what you are talking about. It seems like you are wanting to create a rounded corner effect with the above markup. [...] > UC 2 : > > They're also problems if you have something like : > <div class="relative" style="z-index: 1"> > A : I want to be above B > <div class="absolute">C : I want to be below D > </div> > <div class="relative"> > B : I want to be below A > <div class="absolute" style="z-index: 2">D : I want to be above C > </div> This is invalid markup. > If we can avoid the creation of a new stacking context inside the > "relative" elements, the problem would be solvable[...] > Fremy I don't see where the problem is that needs to be solved. -- Alan http://css-class.com/ Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power - Abraham Lincoln Save the Internet - http://www.savetheinternet.com/
Received on Wednesday, 20 August 2008 09:47:39 UTC