- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 00:27:28 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
Patrick Garies wrote: > > This could be dealt with by adding a shareability flag and/or domain > white‐listing mechanism to CSS3 Web Fonts that could prevent a Web font > from being shared indirectly. That's what EOT fonts already do, and it is that model that people are rejecting in this thread. Actually, the sharability information (people have referred to this as machine readable licences) doesn't even need EOT. EOT basically is a domain whitelisting wrapper. Basically, you are proposing to keep the status quo ante. -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2008 23:26:42 UTC