- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:29:00 -0700
- To: "Brian J. Fink" <desertowl23@gmail.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Brian J. Fink wrote: > I mean, just like the contextual selector is: > > selector1 selector2 > > the indirect ancestor selector2 of selector1 could be notated as: > > selector2 ^ selector1 > > and like the direct descendant is notated by: > > selector1 > selector2 > > so the direct ancestor could be: > > selector1 < selector2 Yes, I know what you meant. :) What I'm saying is that instead of selector1 ^ selector2 and selector1 < selector2 you'd have (for example) (selector1) selector2 and (selector1) > selector2 It uses the same syntax as before, we just add some kind of syntax for marking which element is being matched, i.e. it no longer has to be the rightmost element. There are other approaches, but I think this is the most straightforward one. ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2008 16:29:42 UTC