- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:40:23 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
Proposed changes: Change #1: Append to section 3.1: Syntax | All strings—including the empty string and strings representing | invalid URIs—are valid namespace names in @namespace declarations. to clarify that the empty string is a valid namespace name. Change #2: Add to section 3.3: Declaring prefixes | Where the empty string is not recognized as a possible namespace, | local names associated with an empty string default namespace | must be interpreted as being associated with no namespace. to define what the empty string means as a default namespace. Change #3: Replace in section 4: CSS Qualified Names | In a CSS qualified name, a prefix that is declared to represent the | empty string namespace ("") is interpreted as representing no namespace. with | When a CSS qualified name is used in a context (such as Selectors | [[SELECT]]) that does not recognize association with the empty | string namespace and lack of a namespace as two distinct, valid | possibilities, prefixes representing the empty string namespace | and no namespace must be treated as equivalent. | | For example, given the namespace declarations: | | @namespace empty ""; | @namespace ""; | | The type selectors elem, |elem, and empty|elem are equivalent. If there are no objections, these changes should close all remaining (known) issues in the CSS Namespaces module and we can prepare for CR. ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2008 22:41:05 UTC