- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:33:22 +0200
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
* fantasai wrote: >Tests: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2008Apr/att-0066/empty-default-namespace.xml > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2008Apr/att-0066/empty-namespace-prefix.xml > >Test results: > > empty default matches || empty prefix matches > no-NS | any-NS || no-NS | any-NS >----------------+-----------+-----------++-----------+-----------+ >Firefox 2 | yes | yes || yes | no | >Firefox 3 | yes | yes || yes | no | >Opera 9.25 | yes | no || no | no | >Opera 9.5 | yes | no || no | no | >Konqueror 3.5.8 | yes | yes || yes | yes | >Safari 3.1.1 | yes | yes || yes | no | >Safari Nightly | yes | yes || yes | no | I think the results need to be either (yes yes no no) because the imple- mentation ignored the @namespace declaration, or (yes no yes no) because you treat it as indicating no namespace. Perhaps (no no no no) might be okay aswell, but there does not seem to be a good reason to allow any of these results. Do you get the same results when using url() instead of the string notation? -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2008 10:33:58 UTC