Re: [cssom-view] small update

Ambrose Li wrote:
> This was exactly the problem Garrett was raising originally, viz. that the
> way the spec is currently written is going to ensure (or rather has
> resuted in) incompatibility, or "divergent implementations".

Well...  There are already divergent implementations (as in any reverse 
engineering scenario).  I'm not sure why we're blaming a still-a-draft spec for 
incompatibilities that have been around for years.

> I don't really understand why this is so hard to get across.

Speaking for myself, I hadn't even seen the first few mails in this thread.  By 
the time I started paying attention, it was more name-calling on both sides than 
anything else.


Received on Friday, 11 April 2008 21:34:54 UTC