- From: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
- Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2008 01:24:48 +1100
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > I think it would make sense if it was more trivial to specify a fallback > color then by using > > background:transparent / red url(...); > > the first being optional would already be more useful > > background:/ red url(...); > > and would align more with what I do now some cases > > background:url(...); > > (It has been suggested that "/ red" is not pretty. In that case we > should probably think of something better :-)) So the slash / would indicate that a UA falls back to the transparent background? Is this for users who have disabled background images? Can you clearly define why you in some cases use this? background:url(...); This seems consisted with my use of (or similar). background: url(real.png), url(...); ;-) Alan http://css-class.com/test/
Received on Friday, 4 April 2008 14:26:16 UTC