RE: [css-selectors]

The i18n WG made some comments on this.  (See comment 18 at [1]).  Click on
the envelope icons to follow the threads through, and you'll see that there
is some alternative wording in the internal editors draft at [2].

Note, btw, that RFC 3066 is now obsolete.  It was replaced by RFC 4646 and
RFC 4647, which should be referred to usually using the generic reference
BCP 47 [3].

RI



[1] http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0601-css3-selectors/
[2]
http://www.w3.org/Style/Group/css3-src/css3-selectors/Overview.html#lang-pse
udo
[3] http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/bcp/bcp47.txt

============
Richard Ishida
Internationalization Lead
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)
 
http://www.w3.org/International/
http://rishida.net/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/
 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-style-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of James Elmore
> Sent: 26 September 2007 16:18
> To: CSS
> Subject: [css-selectors]
> 
> 
> After reviewing the Grid module, I started reviewing some of 
> the other modules. In the Selectors module, I found the 
> example for section "6.6.3 The language pseudo-class :lang" 
> which seems wrong.
> 
> Does the selector ':lang(fr-be)' match French and/or Belgian, 
> or does it match the Belgian dialect of French? As I remember 
> the language specification (possibly incorrectly), I believe 
> it should be the latter. If my memory is correct, then the 
> example in the specification needs to be fixed.
> 
> I checked the referenced document (RFC3066) and it seems my 
> recall isn't totally wrong. If my memory is failing, would 
> someone please point out where the correct information lies?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> James Elmore
> 
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 27 September 2007 11:57:24 UTC