- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 22:22:24 +0100
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> It is not a good idea to invalidate the presumption that CSS is >> relatively benign. > > That is already an unsafe assumption given the vendor extensions in > existance. Doesn't surprise me. Executable content is just too appealing to people who don't understand the risks. I'm glad I'm not an IT manager, particular one somewhere with high security requirements. -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Saturday, 27 October 2007 21:22:40 UTC