- From: Alan Gresley <alan1@azzurum.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:54:23 -0700
- To: Brad Kemper <brkemper@comcast.net>
- cc: www-style@w3.org
Brad Kemper wrote in reply to Freyjkell:
> > // valid:
> >
> > body
> > {
> > background: url('top_left.jpg') top left, url('bottom_right.jpg')
> > bottom right;
> > }
> > @media (renderer:Trident)
> > {
> > body
> > {
> > background:url('alternative.jpg');
> > }
> > }
> >
> > --
> > Freyjkell
> >
>
> Yes. I would see something like this example as a useful guidance
> note to accompany the specification in the Recommendation.
But that is not needed. The same can be done with.
body
{
background: url('alternative.jpg') center;
}
body
{
background: url('top_left.jpg') top left, url('bottom_right.jpg') bottom right;
}
All browsers that I have tested in that doesn't support multiple backgrounds will ignore the later rule block and use the earlier rule block instead. This is what this updated test case demonstrates.
http://css-class.com/test/css/colorsbackgrounds/multiple-backgrounds.htm
It has be altered to be nice to IE5.5 or earlier. No escape is needed now.
Kind regards, Alan
Received on Friday, 30 November 2007 17:54:42 UTC