- From: Alan Gresley <alan1@azzurum.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:54:23 -0700
- To: Brad Kemper <brkemper@comcast.net>
- cc: www-style@w3.org
Brad Kemper wrote in reply to Freyjkell: > > // valid: > > > > body > > { > > background: url('top_left.jpg') top left, url('bottom_right.jpg') > > bottom right; > > } > > @media (renderer:Trident) > > { > > body > > { > > background:url('alternative.jpg'); > > } > > } > > > > -- > > Freyjkell > > > > Yes. I would see something like this example as a useful guidance > note to accompany the specification in the Recommendation. But that is not needed. The same can be done with. body { background: url('alternative.jpg') center; } body { background: url('top_left.jpg') top left, url('bottom_right.jpg') bottom right; } All browsers that I have tested in that doesn't support multiple backgrounds will ignore the later rule block and use the earlier rule block instead. This is what this updated test case demonstrates. http://css-class.com/test/css/colorsbackgrounds/multiple-backgrounds.htm It has be altered to be nice to IE5.5 or earlier. No escape is needed now. Kind regards, Alan
Received on Friday, 30 November 2007 17:54:42 UTC