- From: Allan Sandfeld Jensen <kde@carewolf.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 21:34:23 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Monday 26 November 2007 19:05, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > The Selectors Level 3 specification should probably go into more detail on > how boxes for ::selection are to be generated so that it's clear how it > interacts with other styles, etc. That would also help if someone decides > to support background-image for ::selection. > > WebKit and Gecko support it in such a way that it doesn't affect the > selection color of child elements. So if you have: > > p::selection { background:lime } > > <p>FOO<span>BAR</span>BAZ</p> > > and someone selects "FOOBARBAZ" "BAR" will have the default selection > color. I don't really care about how this is going to be done, but I'd > like it to be defined. > > (It would probably be good if someone tackled ::first-letter and > > ::first-line too which have similar issues.) I am surprised WebKit doesn't support that case, since KHTML does and I think we implemented ::selection after WebKit example. Anyway we still have issues with ::selection since we just only inherit the first parent declaration of ::selection. This creates problems with multiple levels of ::selection, but this is the exact same bug all browsers have with ::first-letter and ::first-line. p::selection { background:lime } span::selection { font-width: bold } <p>FOO<span>BAR</span>BAZ</p> FOO and BAZ will have lime background, BAR will only be bold. Unlike the above example where BAR would be lime. This behavior matches common implementations of ::first-letter and ::first-line. The correct method of how to combine multiple ::first-letter or ::first-line declarations is very clear, still no one has implemented it, I would naturally assume ::selection follows a similar model. `Allan
Received on Monday, 26 November 2007 20:34:39 UTC