- From: Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 07:21:08 +0200
- To: <www-style@w3.org>
Felix Miata wrote: > On 2007/11/20 19:46 (GMT+0100) Bert Bos apparently typed: > >> The semi-official font of W3C is Gill Sans. We use it on paper >> publications and business cards. It is not required to use it on Web >> pages (because not everybody has the font > > NAICT, "not everybody" is a gross understatement. I've never seen it > installed on anything except a Mac, unless Lotus Smartsuite was > installed. Is it ever bundled with anything other than Mac or > Smartsuite? I suspected something similar, and a quick look at the compilation http://www.codestyle.org/css/font-family/sampler-WindowsResultsFull.shtml seemed to support this: "Gill Sans" has less than 3% coverage on Windows systems (according to survey results that are certainly biased, with many sources of errors, but still much better than mere guesses). Then I realized that the long list also has "Gill Sans MT", with about 50% coverage, and it is also listed in the font-family list of the W3C stylesheet. I have no idea of how much this might differ from other Gill Sans implementations. Checking from http://www.microsoft.com/typography/fonts/font.aspx?FID=155&FNAME=Gill+Sans+MT we can deduce that "Gill Sans MT" is part of some Microsoft Office distributions. Then there's "GillSans", too. My current computer seems to have it but neither of the above. Generally, when authors write longish lists of fonts "to be safe", they just copy the list from somewhere or make guesses based on casual information on font similarity. An author who has a list of ten fonts in his font-family list probably checked his page on one or two of them only. Sometimes the lists are just crazy, listing all kinds of fonts with quite different characteristics. But I guess the W3C people know better than that and actually compared the fonts and checked their suitability. I'd suggest considering whether Calibri would fit in into the list somewhere. Its general appearance is similar to Gill Sans. (Personally I find Calibri a little more readable and pleasant-looking, perhsps due to slightly thinner strokes.) Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca") http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2007 05:18:24 UTC