- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:44:54 +0100
- To: "Henri Sivonen" <hsivonen@iki.fi>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "W3C Style List" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:34:43 +0100, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> wrote: > Does that mean ignoring for UA processing but counting as errors as far > as validation goes? Yes. > As for empty strings, these are all errors, right? > "all," > ",all" > "print,,screen" I think that would make sense, though " " should also be a conforming media query meaning all. Maybe media_query_list should be defined as follows to capture that: media_query_list: WS? | [WS? <media_query> [WS? , WS? <media_query> ]* WS?] > As Anne pointed out, the whitespace issue still remains. > > Also, are the keywords supposed to be tokenized as idents from CSS3 > Syntax and then compared against a list of known names or are the key > words in theory part of the low level syntax? (I supposed this only > makes a difference for what error message would be right.) Hmm, I suppose another problem is whether CSS escaping is allowed. This would make a limited amount of sense for @media, but not really for media="". -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2007 14:45:22 UTC