- From: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@exchange.microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 11:42:52 -0700
- To: Brady Duga <duga@ljug.com>
- CC: W3C CSS <www-style@w3.org>
I agree, it is a good idea to state explicitly that floats override the clipping behavior of columns. -----Original Message----- From: Brady Duga [mailto:duga@ljug.com] Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 11:32 AM To: Alex Mogilevsky Cc: Brady Duga; W3C CSS Subject: Re: [css3-gcpm] Multi-column floats overflowing the column On May 4, 2007, at 11:21 AM, Alex Mogilevsky wrote: > > There is no contradiction here. GCPM defines new kinds of float > behavior, specifically with the intent of overriding clipping > behavior of columns. Therefore definition of how these new floats > interact with other objects (including columns) belongs in GCPM. That's fine - I'm not saying it shouldn't be allowed to flow out of the columns, but I do see a contradiction (or at least potential confusion) in the current wording. The draft says it extends the functionality of the multi-column spec, not that it replaces it. Since the multi-column spec says things get clipped and this draft never explicitly modifies that constraint, it appears that it should still be in place. I would like to see some text explaining when (for paged media) it is allowed for floated content to flow into neighboring columns. Always? Only when using one of the new float values? Only when float-offset is specified? --Brady
Received on Friday, 4 May 2007 18:43:11 UTC