- From: Zoffix Znet <zoffix@zoffix.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 21:09:49 -0400
- To: Pascal Germroth <pascal@germroth.name>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 12:17 +0200, Pascal Germroth wrote:
> Maybe values > 1 should be allowed for opacity? For example:
>
> #photo { opacity : 2; }
>
> Would mean that the element, whose pixels have an "effective" opacity of
> 0.5 would have the "effective" opacity of its pixels doubled, to 1.0,
> meaning they are rendered with double opacity, which is then halved by
> the body element and appears thus just plain opaque to the viewer.
>
> I don't know if this could be implemented as graphics libraries often
> "clamp" the colour values to [0;1]...
>
>
Hm, I was more thinking of the opacity being like this:
<div id="parent">
<div id="child">
</div>
</div>
#parent { opacity: .5; }
#child { opacity: 1;}
Now, everything is rendered according to the way `opacity` works right
now. The exception will be that since #child has `opacity` set too, it
would be, umm, I guess I can say "re-rendered" with the opacity value
that is set on it. Thus the #parent will be half-transparent, but the
child will be rendered without any transparency.
What I mean, is that if an element has `opacity` property set it should
be re-rendered with the set opacity which would not relate to the one of
parent's
--
Thank you for your time.
Regards, Zoffix Znet
( http://zoffix.com , http://haslayout.net )
Received on Tuesday, 1 May 2007 01:09:59 UTC