- From: Raul Dias <raul@dias.com.br>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 09:00:56 -0300
- To: Daniel Beardsmore <public@telcontar.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 02:40 +0100, Daniel Beardsmore wrote: > Spartanicus wrote: > > about five years to be implemented ... > > Good grief. Either CSS is already in a far worse shape than I realised, or > you're severely over-estimating the complexity of basic layout. If it takes > *FIVE* years for people to write some simple layout code, then CSS needs > taking out, shooting and starting over. ... > Five years ... I don't know if browsers have crap coders, or CSS is so > unwieldy that it will take that long to figure out how anyone is supposed to > build on it. Consider that the CSS 2 specification was written 9 years ago and still not fully implemented on major browsers (the exception might be opera). This is just what I think about it, not necessarily true. Back in the MS vs Netscape War days, implementaion and development were in a fast pace because of competition. Who ever satisfied webdevelopers needs first got the cut. Which lead to a sea of propietary resources which some came to a common ground later through standards. So, back then standards play catch up with the browsers. This fast development had a cost, Bad Code. NS 5 didnt take off and IE7 needed a lot of rewriten too (AFAIK). So, now the browsers are catching with standards. Mozilla was written from the ground up with standards in mind (a lot to catch up) an IE7 difference with IE6 is mostly about standads compliance. The "problem" as I see, is that browsers now are waiting for standards to dictate the rules, but standard pace is slow as it always was. So now that the browsers catched most of where the standards are, developers are catching up too and the "holes" of the standards start to become clear. This is a good thing because allows the standards to walk in the path it is really needed, it doesnt have to guess what developers would like to have. Developers are already crying at their door for what they need. The "problem" is that by the slowliness to get things done, browsers might start to go heavy again on proprietary stuff to solve developers needs. IE still have 70%+ of the market so still easy for MS to recover ground and ditch the competition (I was already expecting this from IE7). Or easier to Mozilla and others to step up and get more ground. If this happens, there will be a war again and standards will be playing catch up again with browsers. -Raul Dias
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2007 12:02:08 UTC