- From: Spartanicus <mk98762@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:32:11 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
James Elmore <James.Elmore@cox.net> wrote: >Why not add simple layout to CSS / HTML and incrementally improve it, rather >than trying to find the perfect solution of the perfect layout system which can >cover all bases? We've long past the point where that would have been useful. As I said before we already have a simple mechanism that can be used to create a "layout", a HTML table can be used by those who want something that isn't perfect, it "works" as most people would define it. >That is what started my thoughts and suggestions for this >thread. There are things which are possible only with tables, but they are VERY >complicated to do. Why not allow designers to use some things which tables can >do, but without the complete table requirements? Things like captions, >margin-collapsing, border-overlap, constraints on the sizes of block sets, and >simple extensions to current CSS display-models could help designers make better >web sites and not demand too much in the way of rewriting every existing browser >to contain the perfect layout system. I'm not following, you want the CSS WG to create a new simple layout system that needs to deal with /complicated/ issues such as the ones you mentioned above /and/ without having to rewrite browsers to support this? -- Spartanicus
Received on Monday, 25 June 2007 09:31:23 UTC