- From: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>
- Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 17:50:31 -0700
- To: Nicholas Retallack <nickretallack@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Safari actually supports exactly this already. You can try it out either in nightlies (or in the 3.0 beta). The syntax I used was a little different though. I implemented: -webkit-margin-top-collapse -webkit-margin-bottom-collapse and -webkit-margin-collapse (which sets both) The values I chose were separate - "Don't collapse" collapse - "Do collapse" discard - "Throw the margin away" Discard actually allows for the modeling of the quirky behavior you see in browsers where margins disappear in table cells in quirks mode. Anyway, I completely agree that this should be standardized (and am flexible regarding the syntax). dave On Jun 16, 2007, at 9:41 PM, Nicholas Retallack wrote: > > Margin collapsing has an inconsistency I've never really seen the > reasoning behind-- it only works vertically not horizontally, which > seems an arbitrary decision, and also it can't be turned off. I would > like to suggest that margin collapsing be something we have control > over and can disable. The property could look something like this: > > margin-collapse: vertical | horizontal | both/all | none > > Horizontal margin collapse would go well with horizontal shrinkwrap > styles like display:table-cell/list-item and float. You could also > make a gallery of equally-spaced floating thumbnails or boxes and only > have to specify one margin (margin: 4px) instead of having to halve it > in the horizontal direction since those margins don't collapse > (margin: 4px 2px). > > For extra coolness, have it support top, bottom, left, and right in > there as well, combinatorily, so a user could do this to create a > gallery of tiles of content, eliminating extra margin space on the > right and bottom as it grows and floats: > > ..tile { margin-collapse: top left; margin: 1em 0 0 1em; float:left } > > Also I'm quite sure many users would be very happy to do this: > > * { margin-collapse: none } > >
Received on Monday, 18 June 2007 00:51:00 UTC