- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 00:29:39 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
David Hyatt wrote: > > On Jun 12, 2007, at 2:33 PM, fantasai wrote: > >> >> The rest of these are all very good points, unfortunately I don't have >> answers for you. My suggestion is that you find out what Safari does, >> and if it makes sense, implement that, and if it doesn't, ask Dave Hyatt >> about it. We would have to do the same thing for the spec anyway, since >> Safari implemented 'border-image' without first bringing up these >> problems >> in the spec for discussion and without using a vendor extension. :( > > What? This is patently false. We have always used a vendor extension, > -webkit-border-image. I didn't raise any issues because I didn't come > across any. I think the spec is fine as is. Yes, I apologize for both of those. As I said, I spoke too hastily. > Our implementation has some minor bugs with 'round', but that's our bug > and not any problem in the spec. Actually, I think there is a problem, but it's not one of the ones Andrew raised. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2007Jun/0073.html ~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 16 June 2007 04:29:48 UTC