- From: Paul Nelson (ATC) <paulnel@winse.microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:09:17 -0700
- To: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>, www-style CSS <www-style@w3.org>
- CC: <www-international@w3.org>
Because the behavior is specific to Tibetan typography, and will be one challenging piece of work, I would avoid unifying either of these marks with the English works for existing behaviors. That would block existing behaviors from being applied to Tibetan. Paul -----Original Message----- From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Christoph Päper Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 2:11 AM To: www-style CSS Cc: www-international@w3.org Subject: Re: [CSS3 Text] Tibetan Emphasis marks Paul Nelson (ATC): > It would be easy enough to add support for this to CSS3 'text- > emphasis' property by adding something the following values (not > intuitive names and prone to typographic errors): > > nyizla - uses the Tibetan mark U+0F35 as the emphasis mark > sgorrtags - uses the Tibetan mark U+0F37 as the emphasis mark I'd like to see these unified with English words that would also describe emphasis marks for other (Asian) scripts. U+0F37, at least, looks close enough to a 'circle'. Is |text-emphasis|, by the way, suitable for Latin-script poems, songs and prayers, which may feature similar marks? > The use of these marks for other than Tibetan text would need to be > undefined to preclude people doing "creative" things with this > property. Creativity /can/ be a good thing, even in typography. A language like CSS should not raise artificial boundaries.
Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2007 21:08:43 UTC