- From: Philip TAYLOR <Philip-and-LeKhanh@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 08:32:07 +0100
- To: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
David Woolley wrote: > If you are staying within W3C technologies, I would suggest that this > would be an SVG application, as I very much doubt that the average > author of such documents will care about accessibility. Can you explain this further, David ? Are you arguing that, when a group of authors for a particular realm are unlikely to car about accessibility, they should be pushed towards using a language that ignores the need for accessibility [1] rather than being pushed to realise that accessibility matters ? Philip Taylor -------- [1] I don't know if SVG /does/ "ignore the need for accessibility", but that is the drift I get from David's message, whence the reason for my question.
Received on Tuesday, 3 July 2007 07:32:14 UTC