- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 23:35:52 +0100
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: "Grant, Melinda" <melinda.grant@hp.com>, "www-style" <www-style@w3.org>
On Tuesday, January 30, 2007, 2:41:14 PM, I wrote: CL> much of the Microsoft documentation has old dates, like 2001. I would CL> be glad of pointers to more recent and more technically detailed CL> documentation. I checked with Microsoft. They tell me that ICM 2.0 in Windows XP SP2 supports only version 2 ICC profiles as specified in the ICC profile specification version 3.2 (Note: There never was a "version 3" ICC profile: profiles corresponding to versions 3.x of the ICC profile format specification document are all version 2 profiles). CL> The CMS in Windows Vista is supposed to be a big improvement. Support for version 4 ICC profiles was only added to ICM with the Windows Color System in Windows Vista. So, current Windows systems are correctly described by the ICC 3.2 specification currently referenced; unless a third-party CMS like Kodak, Adobe, LinoColor or whatever is installed, version 4 profiles will not be understood. CL> In general (to get back to your question) it seems to be the right CL> thing to update to the current version, it may be ok to go for "this CL> version or higher" and I would prefer to have more hard facts to go CL> on. I have a couple of enquiries going and will report back. At this CL> point I am mainly concerned with when Microsoft ICM 2.0 was updated CL> and to check what version of ICC profiles is supported in the version CL> that ships today (XP SP2). It seems that my caution was, unfortunately, well justified. OS X and Linux are on ICC v.4, but Windows XP is by default still on v.2 -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Interaction Domain Leader Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Tuesday, 30 January 2007 22:36:02 UTC