- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:48:57 -0500
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, "w3c-css-wg@w3.org" <w3c-css-wg@w3.org>
L. David Baron wrote: > On Tuesday 2007-11-06 07:15 -0800, Markus Mielke wrote: >> Proposal: >> It would actually be better to create a new property called: >> >> ' alignment' >> Value: left |center | right | inherit > > This also needs to have 'start' and 'end'. Second that. > I'd propose one substantive change: I think that it should affect how > the element is aligned in its parent, not how the children are aligned > within the element. I agree. It makes a lot more sense this way. > Second, I'd defer to the formal definition of computing heights and margins > to define how it works -- and this definition would make this (inherited) > property weaker than auto margins. > > Thus I'd rewrite this as: > > This property describes how block boxes: > 1. without 'auto' side margins, and > 2. smaller than the width that would fit in their containing block > are aligned within their containing block when they have no 'auto' > margins. This property aligns blocks by changing the margins that are > used in the section on <a > href="http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visudet.html#Computing_widths_and_margins">computing > widths and margins. I think that in this case a specified margin should act as a "minimum" margin. ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 3 December 2007 22:49:15 UTC