- From: Spartanicus <mk98762@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:42:30 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk> wrote: >> In the IMO extremely unlikely situation that such a minor potential >> stylistic clash with a user stylesheet would be classed as a problem > >Companies can be remarkably sensitive about violations of house style, >and, in particular, logos. In the early days of Windows, people in the >company I worked for at the time started improvising the logo on their >PCs. A message was sent from the marketing director that the logo must >only appear in the official colours - difficult with 16 or 256 colours! > >> that would require a fix, that would be an issue for the developer and >> company to solve, not a CSS spec issue. > >This will normally be resolved by removing the requirement to allow user >style sheets, which was probably never formally on the table, in the >first place. Facilitating user stylesheets is a task for /browser manufacturers/. A potential desire to prevent users from altering author styling could exist with web /authors/. A browser manufacturer that wants to claim spec conformance at least has to allow author stylesheets to be disabled (I don't recall if the facility to create user stylesheets is a spec requirement). Are you saying that web authors have been, and are successful in pressuring browser manufacturers to remove a user's ability to disable or override author styling? >What is really being attempted here is to preseve the >right to configure ones own browser, not the ability of the author to >create what they want. You can't argue that authors should be able to ensure that their style isn't overridden and then claim that you are arguing this on behalf of a user's right to do just that. -- Spartanicus
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2007 09:28:13 UTC