Re: [XHTML 2] renaming :link to :unvisited

David Latapie wrote:
> 
> “(:link means "unvisited"; and no, I don't know why they didn't call it 
> that.)”
> 
> I think Eric Meyer has a point here. Changing it would make it easier to 
> understand.
> 
> What do you think of it?

Actually, if we were changing anything, I'd suggest making :link apply to
both visited and unvisited links; but making any changes at this point would
break backward-compatibility in a big way. :link and :visited have been in
CSS since level 1, and have been interoperably implemented in browsers for
a long time.

~fantasai