- From: Paul Nelson (ATC) <paulnel@winse.microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 19:25:19 -0700
- To: Manuel Strehl <manuel.strehl@stud.uni-regensburg.de>, <www-style@w3.org>
- CC: <www-style@w3.org>
Here is some markup that handles your poem justification example...at least in IE. <html> <body> <div style="background-color: teal; padding: 20px 20px 20px 20px; text-align: justify; text-align-last: justify; text-justify: newspaper;"> Mary had a little lamb,<br> Its fleece was white as snow.<br> Everywhere that Mary went,<br> The lamb was sure to go. </div> </body> </html> -----Original Message----- From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Manuel Strehl Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 7:04 PM To: www-style@w3.org Cc: www-style@w3.org Subject: Re: [CSS3 box] Proposal: content-align Hi again. Horizontal align: mostly there's no effect, due to the lines completely filling the space, but in hindsight to XHTML 2's <l> element, there could be a need for this property, where, e.g., the lines of a poem don't stretch over the width assigned to the container. So, to be clear, this is not about 'text-align', like Anne correctly stated, but how to handle the remaining space between the content bounding box and the width and height of the container. Percentage values: I would like it to be read like the percentage values of "fit-position", where, with increasing percentages, the position inside the bounding box is wandering. So, 0% 0% is equal to aligning the upper left, 100% 100% aligning the lower right corner with the box defined by width and height of the container. Some time ago I was asking the list about padding:auto, but we agreed that that's not the right way to handle it. The suggested inner box from Werner on the other hand is something that disagrees with my understanding of separation of content and style, for it would introduce a <div> or similar just for aligning. Thanks anyway for the comment! But even then, margin-top:auto will have to be defined (which I would, for the sake of consistency, welcome!). Regards Manuel
Received on Thursday, 14 September 2006 02:25:03 UTC