- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 10:00:28 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
- CC: 'WWW International' <www-international@w3.org>
Steven Pemberton wrote: > >> [Question 4 (XHTML] >> If XHTML does in fact rely on CSS declarations to cause the appropriate >> display of overridden text, then how does it square the fact that the >> behaviour will change, depending on whether people use CSS2 or CSS2.1 >> enabled implementations? > > Ugh. I'm willing to bet that no CSS2 implementation has implemented the > spec for this, and so the question is moot. Actually, they have, and that's probably why it's written the way it is in CSS2.1. IE and Mozilla both implement bidi-override per CSS2.1; Opera implements it as specified in CSS2. (Konqueror and Safari don't implement it at all.) ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 24 October 2006 14:01:05 UTC