- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 22:27:46 +0100 (BST)
- To: www-style@w3.org
> In the former situation, why would you have a link that redirects to > the current page? I don't think it's unreasonable to require websites to It's very common. Most people will link to the home page as /, which will generate a redirect to the true home page (in some cases internally, but the location will still get updated). Sub-site home pages are often, incorrectly, given without the trailing /, which typically results in a real, permanently moved, redirect to the name with a /, followed by, a possibly internal, redirect to the actual index/default page. Content negotation will often result in an updated URL (both for language and for browser, even if the latter is undesirable). There may be browser sniffing or cookie priming steps. I've found it not that uncommon for commercial web sites to go through four or five redirects before they get to a page (although I don't condone this practice). There is also a very common, although, in my view, undesirable practice of putting .... href="#" onclick="....", where the scripting opens a link. Note also, that this is not a new proposal, so you really do need to search the archives.
Received on Friday, 13 October 2006 21:29:59 UTC