- From: Mikko Rantalainen <mikko.rantalainen@peda.net>
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 13:21:43 +0300
- To: www-style@w3.org
Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: > As far as I understand there is no way in CSS [1,2,3] > to define rule: > "set width of the block to 300px but not less than > min-intrinsic width of its content" > using existing set of attributes or/and values, am I right? > [...] > td { overflow:none; } > -or- > td { min-width: min-intrinsic; } > [...] > (I know that there are no such value as 'none' in overflow currently) +1 for "min-width: min-intrinsic". I think that overflow shouldn't have such control over size of the blocks. Should there be restrictions with intrinsic values? Does all of these make any sense (when applied alone to a single element): min-width: min-intrinsic; min-width: intrinsic; min-width: max-intrinsic; width: min-intrinsic; width: intrinsic; width: max-intrinsic; max-width: min-intrinsic; max-width: intrinsic; max-width: max-intrinsic; -- Mikko
Received on Thursday, 30 March 2006 10:22:23 UTC