- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:30:07 +0200
- To: werner.donne@re.be
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Also sprach Werner Donné:
> 1) The leader function can have a string as well as a keyword as
> its first argument. Since there is always a string alternative
> for the keywords and since the approach is based on glyphs, I
> think the keywords are not needed. They would only be needed
> for things that are drawn by the UA, in which case for example
> the spacing between the dots or the thickness of the rule should
> be definable through a property.
True, they are not needed. It's merely convenience.
> 2) The second optional argument to the leader function is not needed.
> Regular properties influence the appearance of leaders, so the
> regular inheritance rules can be applied.
The reason for having it is to achieve uniform leader sizes on pages
with different font sizes. For example, in a toc you may have chapter
entries with a (relatively) big size, and a subsection entry with a
(relatively) small size. However, most often, you want the leaders
extending from the text to have a uniform size.
> 3) The WD asks "Should other properties influence the appearance of leaders?".
> If leaders are repetitions of glyphs they are inline material and
> hence any property that applies to inline elements should also
> apply to leaders.
So, if 'letter-spacing' is set on a toc entry, dotted leaders should
be spaced out as well?
> 4) Determining the length of a leader is based on the available empty
> space on a line. It should also be possible to fix its length,
> either through a property of type <length> (leader-length for example),
> or perhaps by specifying the number of repetitions in an optional
> argument to the leader function.
I disagree here. Leaders, by definition have a flexible length. If you
knew the lenth, you would use a regular element.
However, setting the *minimum* lenght of a leader is reasonable, I think.
-h&kon
Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Friday, 16 June 2006 09:30:08 UTC