- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 08:32:31 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 06:41:26 +0200, Kelly Miller <lightsolphoenix@gmail.com> wrote: >> Why would you need this when we get calc()? > > On background-position, what would calc(100% - 25px) mean? How about > calc(50% + 40px)? > > background-position is hard to define in terms of using calc, because of > the odd way the system works (where 100% is far to the right, and 100% > does not equal the exact width of the object in pixels). See http://www.w3.org/mid/20060613210028.GA23945@ridley.dbaron.org for some thoughts on that. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 14 June 2006 06:33:06 UTC