- From: Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 18:40:47 +0000
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: ishida@w3.org, www-style@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
It was clearly felt to be acceptable as an example when http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-html40-970917/struct/dirlang.html was written. -------- Ian Hickson wrote: > On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Philip TAYLOR wrote: > >>I cannot see that this change accomplishes anything. RFC 3066 says "- >>Dialect or variant information, such as en-scouse" where the phrase >>"such as" is clearly essential. The use of "en-scouse" as an example in >>no way precludes the possibility of "en-cockney" being an equally valid >>production. > > > Except that en-scouse is registered and valid, and en-cockney is not. >
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2006 19:07:22 UTC