I18n comment: rfc3066 or successor

Comment from the i18n review of:

Comment 8
At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0601-css3-selectors/
Editorial/substantive: S
Location in reviewed document:
Sec. 6.3.1 [http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-css3-selectors-20051215/#attribute-representation]

"as described in RFC 3066 ([RFC3066])"

Recommend 'as described in RFC 3066 ([RFC3066]) or its successor'.

Note that its successor is currently only awaiting the IETF editor to assign an RFC number, but has been approved by the IETF to succeed RFC3066. Note also that it will allow for additional subcode values, such as script identifiers.

> From: Daniel Glazman 
> [mailto:daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com] 
> Sent: 20 January 2006 16:00

> #8 ok

Received on Saturday, 21 January 2006 10:42:21 UTC