- From: Ministeyr <ministeyr@free.fr>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:34:25 +0000
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Ah, didn't know that, sorry. But it doesn't allow to flip the image, though... As I think about it now, it might be too much overhead to always have to specify each image in a border-image separately, like I suggested in my previous mail, so the default syntax is probably way faster and better. Still, what do you think of the possibility to change only one of the corners or sides, in a border-image? Something like that: div{ border-image: url("global-border.png") 30px 30px 30px 30px round stretch;} div.redtop{ border-top-left: url("tl-corner-red.png"); border-top: url("top-red.png"); border-top-left: url("tr-corner-red.png"); //keeping the "global-border.png" for the rest of the border } Could both be compatible? Thanks anyway Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: >* Ministeyr wrote: > > >>Object transformation: >>---------------------- >>It would be nice if you could apply basic transformations (vertical >>flip, horizontal flip, 90 degree rotation, 180 degree rotation) to >>objects, especially images. Something like: >>transform: [vertical-flip | horizontal-flip] || [rotate-right | >>rotate-left | reverse] | none >> >> > >There is http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/CR-css3-page-20040225/#orienting > >
Received on Friday, 20 January 2006 13:57:29 UTC