- From: Kelly Miller <lightsolphoenix@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:55:24 -0500
- To: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 If there is a consideration for a behavioral tag in XML, I believe it should be called behavior, not script. As mentioned, who says that behavior has to be specified using scripting? And yes, I meant in some separate namespace, be it xml:style or css:style or something that can be recognized as saying "this is presentation, not part of the semantic XML". David Woolley wrote: |> Some things are universal, and deserve a special place in the world. |> Style and script are universal to browsers, so I just accept that HTML | | I might be wrong, but I am pretty sure that <script> originated from | JavaScript and not from HTML, or at least not from the HTML standardisation | process. | - -- http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/ - Get Firefox! http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/ - Reclaim Your Inbox! Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD+mT6wWrjHBui99cRAkD3AJwImg7E3VNlK0Qw2XJNBWjDHmCWSQCfbXUn XI7J6gJwPO4UsjqVfb6vm5k= =5g9y -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2006 00:55:36 UTC